The substance is the source of record

An API, an excipient, a raw material: each carries an identity, a grade, an impurity profile, and a supplier behind it. Most operations retype that information into every dossier, every specification, every batch record. Krevyos holds each substance once, as a master the whole operation draws from, so a change to a source or a limit reaches every place it is used.

Domain owner
Head of CMC · Analytical Lead · Regulatory CMC
Substance types
Active ingredients · Excipients · Raw materials · Reagents · Reference standards
Standards
USP · Ph. Eur. · JP · ICH Q3A/B/C/D · ICH M7 · FDA IID

Capabilities

  • Substance masters for API, excipient, and raw material

    Each substance held once, with its identity, grade, and specification: the API, every excipient, and every raw material draw from one record rather than a copy pasted into each product.

    • API / Excipient / Raw material
    • USP / Ph. Eur. / JP grades
  • Impurity and degradation profiles per ICH Q3A/Q3B

    Related substances, degradation products, and nitrosamine risk assessments held against the substance they belong to, so a new impurity finding surfaces everywhere that substance is filed.

    • ICH Q3A / Q3B
    • Nitrosamine risk
    • Genotoxic (M7)
  • DMF and CEP linkage to the supplying source

    The supplier's Drug Master File or Certificate of Suitability is linked to the substance it supports, so a DMF update or a CEP revision is visible to every dossier that relies on it.

    • US DMF Type II
    • EDQM CEP
    • ASMF
  • Excipient precedents against the FDA IID

    Excipient levels checked against Inactive Ingredient Database precedents as they are set, so a level that exceeds precedent is caught in development rather than in a deficiency letter.

    • FDA IID limits
    • Ph. Eur. functionality
  • Elemental impurities and residual solvents per ICH Q3D/Q3C

    Elemental impurity and residual solvent assessments held as part of the substance record, so risk is evaluated once and reused across every product that uses the material.

    • ICH Q3D
    • ICH Q3C
    • Class limits

Touchpoints

Product Design

Formulation draws on the substance master

A formulation references the substances it is built from rather than restating their identity and grade, so a change to a material reaches the formulation that uses it.

Analytical Development

Methods test against the substance specification

Analytical methods and their acceptance criteria are anchored to the substance specification, so a spec change and the method that verifies it never drift apart.

Organizations & Resources

Suppliers and their master files

Each substance carries the supplier and the DMF or CEP behind it, so a supplier change and its qualification status are part of the substance record, not a separate spreadsheet.

Regulatory Affairs

Module 3 substance sections

Drug substance and drug product quality sections are generated from the substance masters, so Module 3 reflects the current identity, limits, and impurity profile without re-entry.

Quality Management

Specifications and out-of-specification limits

Release and stability specifications share the substance record with the quality operation, so a limit change and the results tested against it stay consistent.

Outcomes

  • Time to assemble Module 3 substance sections

    Quality sections are drawn from the substance masters instead of retyped, so assembling a dossier's substance content is a fraction of the manual effort.

  • Duplicate substance records across products

    One master per substance means a material used in ten products is defined once, not maintained in ten diverging copies.

  • Impurity limits traced to a source

    Every impurity and residual-solvent limit points back to the standard and assessment behind it, so a limit is never an orphaned number.

  • Reuse of a qualified substance across products

    A substance already qualified for one product carries its full profile into the next, so onboarding a new product to a known material starts from what is already established.

Figures marked indicative are directional benchmarks against comparable generics operations; per-customer numbers replace them in working sessions.

Want to talk?

Same foundation under every service. A conversation usually clarifies where to start.